<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM Watch admits joke</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.biofortified.org/2009/04/gm-watch-admits-joke/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.biofortified.org/2009/04/gm-watch-admits-joke/</link>
	<description>Stronger plants, stronger science, and stronger communication.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:06:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Haro von Mogel</title>
		<link>http://www.biofortified.org/2009/04/gm-watch-admits-joke/comment-page-1/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Haro von Mogel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biofortified.org/?p=323#comment-442</guid>
		<description>Hi Jemma, thanks for the link, it will be particularly useful when I write about the stuff related to Ignacio Chapela. I actually interviewed him four years ago after he appeared in The Future of Food, and I&#039;ve read a lot about his situation. In particular, how he did not confirm the more controversial findings of his paper, which is what led to the retraction. Neither of his findings have ever been reproduced. (Specifically - the introgression of transgenes into mexican landraces, and the breakup of those transgenes and their spread throughout the genome)

I knew a little about the ugliness at Berkeley that he was involved in, but not the full extent. It just seems odd that a faculty member would hook up with people throwing pies over the Novartis deal - the New Scientist article was particularly interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jemma, thanks for the link, it will be particularly useful when I write about the stuff related to Ignacio Chapela. I actually interviewed him four years ago after he appeared in The Future of Food, and I&#8217;ve read a lot about his situation. In particular, how he did not confirm the more controversial findings of his paper, which is what led to the retraction. Neither of his findings have ever been reproduced. (Specifically &#8211; the introgression of transgenes into mexican landraces, and the breakup of those transgenes and their spread throughout the genome)</p>
<p>I knew a little about the ugliness at Berkeley that he was involved in, but not the full extent. It just seems odd that a faculty member would hook up with people throwing pies over the Novartis deal &#8211; the New Scientist article was particularly interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jemma Gibbon</title>
		<link>http://www.biofortified.org/2009/04/gm-watch-admits-joke/comment-page-1/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Jemma Gibbon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biofortified.org/?p=323#comment-441</guid>
		<description>Fooling the credulous certainly seems to have been Monsanto&#039;s goal. They deployed fake people and even a fictional agricultural center to try and corral their supporters via the net. The case that ended up in the High Court is just the tip of the iceberg. It&#039;s all here.
http://ngin.tripod.com/deceit_index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fooling the credulous certainly seems to have been Monsanto&#8217;s goal. They deployed fake people and even a fictional agricultural center to try and corral their supporters via the net. The case that ended up in the High Court is just the tip of the iceberg. It&#8217;s all here.<br />
<a href="http://ngin.tripod.com/deceit_index.html" rel="nofollow">http://ngin.tripod.com/deceit_index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.biofortified.org/2009/04/gm-watch-admits-joke/comment-page-1/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biofortified.org/?p=323#comment-435</guid>
		<description>Sigh. I&#039;m sure it will become another internet-zombie-myth in the chain.  

Trying to fool a credulous group is not hard. But maybe that was their goal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh. I&#8217;m sure it will become another internet-zombie-myth in the chain.  </p>
<p>Trying to fool a credulous group is not hard. But maybe that was their goal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eleanor L</title>
		<link>http://www.biofortified.org/2009/04/gm-watch-admits-joke/comment-page-1/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Eleanor L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biofortified.org/?p=323#comment-434</guid>
		<description>Wow. That is funny. I had no idea so much stuff was just made up! If you follow the links, there&#039;s even stuff about a libel case that ended up in the High Court in London and which was covered in the press - &quot;Greenpeace wins damages over professor&#039;s &#039;unfounded&#039; allegations&quot; - which arose out of a posting by an entirely fictional character on the AgBioView list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. That is funny. I had no idea so much stuff was just made up! If you follow the links, there&#8217;s even stuff about a libel case that ended up in the High Court in London and which was covered in the press &#8211; &#8220;Greenpeace wins damages over professor&#8217;s &#8216;unfounded&#8217; allegations&#8221; &#8211; which arose out of a posting by an entirely fictional character on the AgBioView list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jemma Gibbon</title>
		<link>http://www.biofortified.org/2009/04/gm-watch-admits-joke/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>Jemma Gibbon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biofortified.org/?p=323#comment-433</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s an example of exactly the same thing that&#039;s 10 x funnier.
http://www.lobbywatch.org/print-profile1.asp?PrId=225</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an example of exactly the same thing that&#8217;s 10 x funnier.<br />
<a href="http://www.lobbywatch.org/print-profile1.asp?PrId=225" rel="nofollow">http://www.lobbywatch.org/print-profile1.asp?PrId=225</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
