One thing to point out about her research was that 10% of her control rats died. As someone who has once worked in a mouse lab – having 10% of the rats not given your experimental treatment die, when only 1% should have died, I can say that this means that the rats were living in poor conditions. Indeed, this is one of many criticisms of her research.

Smith’s writings include a great many unconfirmed stories, and poorly conducted research, which he lists because he knows that his readers will not bother to check up on the facts underlying them. Please try to remember that the next time you feel like calling someone stupid.

Just the sentence, there is no proof anybody has been harmed by GMO is a gigantic lie. The truth is there has, so far been alarming proof that GMO is just as harmfull and even more harmfull than anyone can imagine and that the increasing incidents of harmful effects of GMO is the proof that something is very wrong with GMO.

One does not have far to go, to find proof, but since Karl has avoided anything to enlighten him in his lost crusade for GMO, I shall supply him with some links that could potentially fill the great void of ignorance demonstrated in the above written and very misleading article.

Spilling the Beans is a monthly column available at http://www.responsibletechnology.org.
Publishers and webmasters may offer this article or monthly series to your readers at no charge, by emailing column@responsibletechnology.org.
Individuals may read the column each month by subscribing to a free newsletter at http://www.responsibletechnology.org.

To redicule a man who has devoted a great del of time to expose the GMO industry is not only rediculous it is a dangerous skam.

Note: This comment has been edited after this point because it was a mere cut-and-paste from another site. You can access the content by clicking here.