<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feature Request!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.biofortified.org/2010/01/feature-request/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.biofortified.org/2010/01/feature-request/</link>
	<description>Stronger plants, stronger science, and stronger communication.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:17:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Schnable</title>
		<link>http://www.biofortified.org/2010/01/feature-request/#comment-1679</link>
		<dc:creator>James Schnable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 08:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biofortified.org/?p=1103#comment-1679</guid>
		<description>A couple of more recent grad students out here set up a wiki on gmo a couple of months ago ( http://gmo.wikidot.com/ ). As you can see, it&#039;s still rather sparse. One piece advice I think we could take away from their site (and an early attempt of my own that ended with an embarrassingly short article count) is that if we wanted to undertake something similar would probably be having a plan to write up a list of fundamental entries (what is a gene, what does bt stand for, how are plants transformed etc etc) right off the bat. 

Putting in all that upfront work would put a wiki in a much better position to grow (for lack of a better word) organically from then on. With more of the fundamental concepts already defined, it&#039;d be easier for anyone to write a new article without constantly backtracking to write up definitions for all the terms they used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of more recent grad students out here set up a wiki on gmo a couple of months ago ( <a href="http://gmo.wikidot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://gmo.wikidot.com/</a> ). As you can see, it&#8217;s still rather sparse. One piece advice I think we could take away from their site (and an early attempt of my own that ended with an embarrassingly short article count) is that if we wanted to undertake something similar would probably be having a plan to write up a list of fundamental entries (what is a gene, what does bt stand for, how are plants transformed etc etc) right off the bat. </p>
<p>Putting in all that upfront work would put a wiki in a much better position to grow (for lack of a better word) organically from then on. With more of the fundamental concepts already defined, it&#8217;d be easier for anyone to write a new article without constantly backtracking to write up definitions for all the terms they used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdiff</title>
		<link>http://www.biofortified.org/2010/01/feature-request/#comment-1675</link>
		<dc:creator>pdiff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biofortified.org/?p=1103#comment-1675</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll also add that the GE Snopes idea is one that should really be pursued, whether through a Wiki format or someother protocol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll also add that the GE Snopes idea is one that should really be pursued, whether through a Wiki format or someother protocol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdiff</title>
		<link>http://www.biofortified.org/2010/01/feature-request/#comment-1673</link>
		<dc:creator>pdiff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biofortified.org/?p=1103#comment-1673</guid>
		<description>I know this has been put forward before, but it would be most helpful if users could preview and edit their posts within the forum itself.

Thanks, 
Pdiff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this has been put forward before, but it would be most helpful if users could preview and edit their posts within the forum itself.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Pdiff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anastasia Bodnar</title>
		<link>http://www.biofortified.org/2010/01/feature-request/#comment-1671</link>
		<dc:creator>Anastasia Bodnar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biofortified.org/?p=1103#comment-1671</guid>
		<description>I just found a &lt;a href=&quot;http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2009/01/14/tip-for-merging-two-wordpress-blogs/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blog post&lt;/a&gt; that says it is easy to merge two existing Wordpress blogs into one by simply importing one into the other. I&#039;m currently (when I have time) using the Plugin &quot;Broken Link Checker&quot; to make sure all of my links and photos at Genetic Maize are working (I&#039;ve got lot of bad photos and missing links since I moved from Wordpress to Squarespace and back). Once that&#039;s done, I&#039;ll import my past posts on Genetic Maize over to Biofortified so that people can find more info when they search for a term on Biofortified! We might consider this option for new regular writers as they join Biofortified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found a <a href="http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2009/01/14/tip-for-merging-two-wordpress-blogs/" rel="nofollow">blog post</a> that says it is easy to merge two existing WordPress blogs into one by simply importing one into the other. I&#8217;m currently (when I have time) using the Plugin &#8220;Broken Link Checker&#8221; to make sure all of my links and photos at Genetic Maize are working (I&#8217;ve got lot of bad photos and missing links since I moved from WordPress to Squarespace and back). Once that&#8217;s done, I&#8217;ll import my past posts on Genetic Maize over to Biofortified so that people can find more info when they search for a term on Biofortified! We might consider this option for new regular writers as they join Biofortified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anastasia Bodnar</title>
		<link>http://www.biofortified.org/2010/01/feature-request/#comment-1670</link>
		<dc:creator>Anastasia Bodnar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biofortified.org/?p=1103#comment-1670</guid>
		<description>All of these are great suggestions. I&#039;m looking forward to seeing improvements on Biofortified to help writers and readers find info and make connections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of these are great suggestions. I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing improvements on Biofortified to help writers and readers find info and make connections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergy</title>
		<link>http://www.biofortified.org/2010/01/feature-request/#comment-1669</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biofortified.org/?p=1103#comment-1669</guid>
		<description>I will think about suggestions. 
But now I want to ask you about this article:
A Comparison of the Effects of Three GM Corn Varieties on Mammalian Health. Int J Biol Sci 2009; 5:706-726. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biolsci.org/v05p0706.htm&quot; title=&quot;Full Text&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Full Text&lt;/A&gt;]
What you guys think about it?
I know that it is only statistical re-analysis, but it&#039;s published. And for me it seems like good article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will think about suggestions.<br />
But now I want to ask you about this article:<br />
A Comparison of the Effects of Three GM Corn Varieties on Mammalian Health. Int J Biol Sci 2009; 5:706-726. [<a href="http://www.biolsci.org/v05p0706.htm" title="Full Text" rel="nofollow">Full Text</a>]<br />
What you guys think about it?<br />
I know that it is only statistical re-analysis, but it&#8217;s published. And for me it seems like good article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Haubrich</title>
		<link>http://www.biofortified.org/2010/01/feature-request/#comment-1667</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Haubrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biofortified.org/?p=1103#comment-1667</guid>
		<description>One of the plugins that I found useful is the &quot;Old-Post-Promoter&quot; for WordPress, and what I liked about it is that it would bring out posts that would otherwise have been buried to gain new life and activity. It helped casual readers who didn&#039;t necessarily wish to search the archives by category or tag to get a broader taste of what I was putting up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the plugins that I found useful is the &#8220;Old-Post-Promoter&#8221; for WordPress, and what I liked about it is that it would bring out posts that would otherwise have been buried to gain new life and activity. It helped casual readers who didn&#8217;t necessarily wish to search the archives by category or tag to get a broader taste of what I was putting up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

