by
Frank N. Foode on 28 July 2010
Hi all, Frank N. Foode here. Well while Anastasia and Karl are out pollinating corn each day, I thought I would take the reins of the blog a little bit and tell you about some of my recent adventures. Just a couple weeks ago I went to an open house for the American Society of Agronomy (ASA), Crop Science Society of America (CSSA), and Soil Science Society of America (SSSA). So the ASA/CSSA/SSSA open house, where they showed off their new building in Madison, Wisconsin. But all those S’s are a Stomata-full for a C4 plant like myself, so I’ll stick with calling them the Science Societies.

Here’s the outside of the building, so why don’t you head on inside to the whole photo album to see what I saw and meet who I met!
by
Frank N. Foode on 20 July 2010
Field season is upon us, and the tassels are hot and heavy. Don’t worry, readers of Biofortified, there will be more posts to come, once Karl and Anastasia come back from pollinating the next generation. I’ve already been pollinated so I get to relax.
In the meantime, check out the great post Breeding, Biotech and Bulls from our newest contributor, Matt.
by
Matt DiLeo on 9 July 2010
I’ve been meaning to tell this story for some time. It’s a good example of how not all biotechnology is genetic engineering.
Traditional Breeding
In trad breeding, the breeder/gardener simply crosses two parents that show great (and complementary) traits, grows up the offspring, selects the best and repeats. It’s effective, slow, labor intensive and limited by the perception of the breeder. Most traits are also very heavily impacted by the environment, so each new genotype must be grown in multiple locations +/or multiple years to make sure the recorded phenotype is due to the genetics (not the environment) of the individual. Most of our crops were domesticated and refined this way (quite a success!). Modern breeding has additionally been refined by the development of various statistical techniques and crossing schemes that make the whole process more efficient.
Details on the Dirty Dozen
EWG gives many many reasons why they think you should use the guide, specifying that you (the consumer) should eat organic or at least choose the Clean 15™ over the Dirty Dozen™:
The list of reasons has a lot of scary facts about how many pesticides detected on food, just how “polluted” our bodies are from the things we eat, and explains how our government barely regulates pesticides. Near the bottom, EWG lets us know that despite the scary facts that the need to eat fresh produce outweighs any risk from pesticide residues. They also remind consumers of the importance of eating fresh produce on their FAQ page. Unfortunately, I’m not sure if anyone gets to that part, considering that media coverage of the Shopper’s Guide rarely mentions it, instead focusing on the scary facts (as in ‘Dirty dozen’ produce carries more pesticide residue, group says on CNN Health, which dismisses the silly government for thinking that small amounts of pesticides won’t hurt us).
The truth is, pesticides are scary. As EWG’s Amy Rosenthal says, “Pesticides are designed to kill things.”
The devil, as always, is in the details.
Continue reading…