Forum

Welcome Guest 

Show/Hide Header

Welcome Guest, posting in this forum requires registration.





Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: ENSSER: "No scientific consensus on safety of [GMOs]"
DavRRrrr
Wild Accession
Posts: 17
Permalink
Post Re: ENSSER: "No scientific consensus on safety of [GMOs]"
on: October 22, 2013, 14:55
Quote

A bit from FB:

Kristoffer Landsend wrote

Speaking of ENSSER, there is an interesting link between them and CRIIGEN/Séralini. They both receive funds from the same source, Charles Léopold Mayer Foundation for the Progress of Humankind (FPH).

Source: http://www.fph.ch/article135.html?lang=en

(Please see the footnote, too.)

FPH is funding a very large number of NGOs and activist organizations worldwide, and promotes strongly the sharing of co-operation and intelligence between them: http://www.fph.ch/rubrique33.html

More info: http://www.fph.ch/rubrique9.html?lang=en

How not surprising.

MaryM
Elite Hybrid
Posts: 420
Permalink
Post Re: ENSSER: "No scientific consensus on safety of [GMOs]"
on: October 23, 2013, 16:26
Quote

Oh, and if we are collecting information about the agricultural science influences of the signers, let's not forget John Fagan's perspective on how to do ag right:

DavRRrrr
Wild Accession
Posts: 17
Permalink
Post Re: ENSSER: "No scientific consensus on safety of [GMOs]"
on: October 24, 2013, 08:59
Quote

Looking up the names on the list is so much fun. I considered starting a bs-bingo of pseudosciences.

DavRRrrr
Wild Accession
Posts: 17
Permalink
Post Re: ENSSER: "No scientific consensus on safety of [GMOs]"
on: November 1, 2013, 13:17
Quote

Seneff made the list. Amongst now 230 people.

http://www.ensser.org/fileadmin/user_upload/131030_signatories_as_of_131030_lv.pdf

Todd-
Jenkins
Wild Accession
Posts: 2
Permalink
Post Re: ENSSER: "No scientific consensus on safety of [GMOs]"
on: November 1, 2013, 22:30
Quote

230? What about the countless numbers of other scientists who disagree, and who have WAY more evidence?

Pages: 1 [2]
Mingle Forum by cartpauj
Version: 1.0.34 ; Page loaded in: 0.067 seconds.