GENERA

You are currently browsing the Biofortified GENetic Engineering Risk Atlas (GENERA). This is a database of published, peer-reviewed scientific papers that are related to the risks and safety of genetic engineering in agriculture. You can search the Atlas below.

There are currently 6 studies in the Atlas.
Click here to return to browsing.

About this study

Publication Status:
Click on a study to see this detail
Crops Studied:
Click on a study to see this detail
Type of Study:
Click on a study to see this detail
Source of Funding:
Click on a study to see this detail
Country
Click on a study to see this detail
Study Findings:
Click on a study to see this detail

Search the Atlas

Help build the Atlas

Would you like to submit a study that is not included in the Atlas? Please contact our Editors here.
We are also looking for volunteers who would like to help enter studies into the Atlas.

About Biofortified

Biofortified's volunteer authors are devoted to providing factual information and fostering discussion about plant genetics, especially genetic engineering. The site is written by grad students, professors, and guest experts. Meet our authors on the Authors page.

GENERA


Entries (6)    

1.Safety assessment principles for evaluation of crops in which level of expression of a particular gene has been specifically modulated by RNA interference or by alteration of relevant regulatory protein level.

Abstract

New crop varieties containing traits such as enhanced nutritional profiles, increased yield, and tolerance to drought are being developed. In some cases, these new traits are dependent on small RNAs or regulatory proteins such as transcription factors (TF) that modify the expression of endogenous plant genes. To date, the food and feed safety of genetically modified (GM) crops has been assessed by the application of a set of internationally accepted procedures for evaluating the safety of GM crops. The goal of this paper is to review the main aspects of the current safety assessment paradigm and to recommend scientifically sound principles for conducting a safety assessment for GM crops that are developed by technologies that modify endogenous plant gene expression. Key considerations for such a safety assessment include the following: (1) RNA and TF are generally recognized as safe (GRAS); (2) Genes encoding RNAi and regulatory proteins such as TFs are an important component of the plantgenome; (3) Crops engineered using RNAi modifications are not expected to produce heterologous proteins; (4) The modulation of TFs may result in quantitative differences in endogenous plant components,which can be assessed through agronomic performance and compositional analysis on a caseby-case basis.

Read more about this entry   

2.18 feeding trials carried out with a variety of genetically modified crops in different animals

Abstract

Since 1997, 18 studies with feeds from genetically modified plants (GMP) in the nutrition of dairy cows, growing bulls, growing and finishing pigs, laying hens, chicken for finishing as well as growing and laying quails were conducted at the Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL) in Braunschweig (Germany). The majority of the experiments (16) were undertaken with GMP of the so-called first generation (plants with input traits and without substantial changes in composition) such as Bt-maize, Pat-maize,
Pat-sugar beet, Gt-soybean, Gt-potatoes and Bt-potatoes. Two studies were carried out with GMP of the second generation (plants with output traits or with substantial changes in their chemical composition) such as an altered fatty acids profile in rapeseed or inulin potatoes. In all experiments, feeds from GMP were compared with their isogenic counterparts. The iso- and transgenic feeds were analysed for their composition (proximates, fibre fraction, amino acids, fatty acid pattern, minerals) and undesirable substances (e.g., mycotoxins). Animal studies were carried out for nutritional and safety assessment such as digestibility, feed intake, health and performance of target animal species and quality of food of animal origin. Reproduction was studied in a 10-generation experiment with quails and a 4-generation experiment with laying hens. Duration of experiments and number of animals were limited in some cases due to small amounts of GM-feed available for experimentation.

Read more about this entry   

3.Long term cow feeding study with Bt corn

Abstract

A long-term study over 25 months was conducted to evaluate the effects of genetically modified corn on performance of lactating dairy cows. Thirty-six dairy cows were assigned to two feeding groups and fed with diets based on whole-crop silage, kernels and whole-crop cobs from Bt-corn (Bt-MON810) or its isogenic not genetically modified counterpart (CON) as main components. The study included two consecutive lactations. There were no differences in the chemical composition and estimated net energy content of Bt-MON810 and CON corn components and diets. CON feed samples were negative for the presence of Cry1Ab protein, while in Bt-MON810 feed samples the Cry1Ab protein was detected. Cows fed Bt-MON810 corn had a daily Cry1Ab protein intake of 6.0 mg in the first lactation and 6.1 mg in the second lactation of the trial. Dry matter intake (DMI) was 18.8 and 20.7 kg/cow per day in the first and the second lactation of the trial, with no treatment differences. Similarly, milk yield (23.8 and 29.0 kg/cow per day in the first and the second lactation of the trial) was not affected by dietary treatment. There were no consistent effects of feeding MON810 or its isogenic CON on milk composition or body condition. Thus, the present long-term study demonstrated the compositional and nutritional equivalence of Bt-MON810 and its isogenic CON.

Read more about this entry   

4.12 year study of transgenic apple trees exhibiting stable characteristics and no unexpected alterations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transgenic trees currently are being produced by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and biolistics. The future use of transformed trees on a commercial basis depends upon thorough evaluation of the potential environmental and public health risk of the modified plants, transgene stability over a prolonged period of time and the effect of the gene on tree and fruit characteristics. We studied the stability of expression and the effect on resistance to the fire blight disease of the lytic protein gene, attacin E, in the apple cultivar ‘Galaxy’ grown in the field for 12 years.
RESULTS: Using Southern and western blot analysis, we compared transgene copy number and observed stability of expression of this gene in the leaves and fruit in several transformed lines during a 12 year period. No silenced transgenic plant was detected. Also the expression of this gene resulted in an increase in resistance to fire blight throughout 12 years of orchard trial and did not affect fruit shape, size, acidity, firmness, weight or sugar level, tree morphology, leaf shape or flower morphology or color compared to the control.
CONCLUSION: Overall, these results suggest that transgene expression in perennial species, such as fruit trees, remains stable in time and space, over extended periods and in different organs. This report shows that it is possible to improve a desirable trait in apple, such as the resistance to a pathogen, through genetic engineering, without adverse alteration of fruit characteristics and tree shape.

Read more about this entry   

5.Maize gene expression and nitrogen fertilization

Abstract

The introduction of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in many   countries follows strict regulations to ensure that only safety-tested   products are marketed. Over the last few years, targeted approaches have   been complemented by profiling methods to assess possible unintended   effects of transformation. Here we used a commercial (Affymertix)   microarray platform (i.e. allowing assessing the expression of   approximately 1/3 of the genes of maize) to evaluate transcriptional   differences between commercial MON810 GM maize and non-transgenic crops   in real agricultural conditions, in a region where about 70% of the   maize grown was MON810. To consider natural variation in gene expression   in relation to biotech plants we took two common MON810/non-GM variety   pairs as examples, and two farming practices (conventional and   low-nitrogen fertilization). MON810 and comparable non-GM varieties   grown in the field have very low numbers of sequences with differential   expression, and their identity differs among varieties. Furthermore, we   show that the differences between a given MON810 variety and the  non-GM  counterpart do not appear to depend to any major extent on the  assayed  cultural conditions, even though these differences may slightly  vary  between the conditions. In our study, natural variation explained  most  of the variability in gene expression among the samples. Up to  37.4% was  dependent upon the variety (obtained by conventional  breeding) and  31.9% a result of the fertilization treatment. In  contrast, the MON810  GM character had a very minor effect (9.7%) on  gene expression in the  analyzed varieties and conditions, even though  similar cryIA(b)  expression levels were detected in the two MON810  varieties and nitrogen  treatments. This indicates that transcriptional  differences of  conventionally-bred varieties and under different  environmental  conditions should be taken into account in safety  assessment studies of  GM plants.

Read more about this entry   

6.Further evaluation of disputed animal tests carried out on corn MON 863

Abstract

MON 863, a genetically engineered corn variety that contains the gene for modified Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Bb1 protein to protect against corn rootworm, was tested in a 90-day toxicity study as part of the process to gain regulatory approval. This study was reanalyzed by Séralini et al. who contended that the study showed possible hepatorenal effects of MON 863. An Expert Panel was convened to assess the original study results as analyzed by the Monsanto Company and the reanalysis conducted by Séralini et al. The Expert Panel concludes that the Séralini et al. reanalysis provided no evidence to indicate that MON 863 was associated with adverse effects in the 90-day rat study. In each case, statistical findings reported by both Monsanto and Séralini et al. were considered to be unrelated to treatment or of no biological or clinical importance because they failed to demonstrate a dose-response relationship, reproducibility over time, association with other relevant changes (e.g., histopathology), occurrence in both sexes, difference outside the normal range of variation, or biological plausibility with respect to cause-and-effect. The Séralini et al. reanalysis does not advance any new scientific data to indicate that MON 863 caused adverse effects in the 90-day rat study

Read more about this entry


Page 1

Share
Comments are closed.